Provisions

Individual rule provisions extracted from part rules documents

Data license: Government edicts — not subject to copyright · Data source: nycourts.gov

4 rows where doc_id = 191

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: cross_references, topics (array), cross_references (array)

judicial_district 1

  • 1 4

doc_type 1

county 1

provision_id ▼ doc_id judge_id rule_number title text source_page topics cross_references judicial_district county court_type doc_type
COHEN3-SEAL-1A Part 3 Sealing Practices and Procedures – Hon. Joel M. Cohen 191 NY-COMDIV-COHEN-J ¶1(a) Motions to Seal – Order to Show Cause Required Motions to seal and/or redact may be made by Order to Show Cause. The movant must indicate whether the motion is opposed or unopposed.   ["courtroom-procedures", "e-filing"] [] 1 New York supreme sealing_procedures
COHEN3-SEAL-1B Part 3 Sealing Practices and Procedures – Hon. Joel M. Cohen 191 NY-COMDIV-COHEN-J ¶1(b) Provisional Sealing Pending OSC Hearing Unredacted versions of putatively confidential documents may be filed by counsel on NYSCEF under the 'Request to Seal' option. The provisional sealing expires, absent court order, after five days. To extend beyond five days, the Order to Show Cause should include a request for interim relief directing that the document remain temporarily under seal accessible only to parties, counsel, and court personnel.   ["e-filing", "courtroom-procedures"] [] 1 New York supreme sealing_procedures
COHEN3-SEAL-1C Part 3 Sealing Practices and Procedures – Hon. Joel M. Cohen 191 NY-COMDIV-COHEN-J ¶1(c) Required Motion Papers Papers in support of a sealing/redaction motion must include: (i) Memorandum of Law setting forth the factual and legal basis for sealing or redacting each document, citing applicable law; (ii) Affidavit Based on Personal Knowledge attesting to factual bases for sealing; (iii) Sealing/Redaction Spreadsheet clearly identifying each unredacted document by NYSCEF number and exhibit number, and the good-faith basis for each proposed redaction (generalized 'confidential business information' statements are not sufficient); (iv) Unredacted documents filed as NYSCEF exhibits with proposed redactions highlighted; (v) Corresponding public copy of each document reflecting proposed redactions.   ["e-filing", "courtroom-procedures"] [] 1 New York supreme sealing_procedures
COHEN3-SEAL-2 Part 3 Sealing Practices and Procedures – Hon. Joel M. Cohen 191 NY-COMDIV-COHEN-J ¶2 Substantive Standard for Sealing General assertions that information contained in documents is 'confidential' are not sufficient. The party seeking to seal court records has the burden to demonstrate compelling circumstances to justify restricting public access. The fact that the parties have a confidentiality agreement or stipulate to sealing is not sufficient. The Court has an independent obligation to determine whether sealing is appropriate. Narrowly targeted redactions are more likely to be permitted than sealing of an entire document or court file.   ["courtroom-procedures", "attorney-conduct"] ["Maxim, Inc. v Feifer, 145 AD3d 516 (1st Dept 2016)", "Gryphon Dom. VI, LLC v APP Intern. Fin. Co., 28 AD3d 322 (1st Dept 2006)", "Danco Labs., Ltd. v Chemical Works of Gedeon Richter, Ltd., 274 AD2d 1 (1st Dept 2000)"] 1 New York supreme sealing_procedures

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE provisions (
    provision_id TEXT PRIMARY KEY,
    doc_id INTEGER REFERENCES documents(doc_id),
    judge_id TEXT REFERENCES judges(judge_id),
    rule_number TEXT,
    title TEXT,
    text TEXT,
    source_page INTEGER,
    topics TEXT,
    cross_references TEXT,
    judicial_district INTEGER,
    county TEXT,
    court_type TEXT DEFAULT 'supreme',
    doc_type TEXT DEFAULT 'part_rules'
);