provision_id,doc_id,judge_id,rule_number,title,text,source_page,topics,cross_references,judicial_district,county,court_type,doc_type
COHEN3-PCO-V,186,NY-COMDIV-COHEN-J,§V,Initial Disclosures,Please confirm that you have exchanged initial disclosures as required by Commercial Division Rule 11-h.,,"[""discovery-scheduling""]","[""Commercial Division Rule 11-h""]",1,New York,supreme,preliminary_conference_order
COHEN3-V,188,NY-COMDIV-COHEN-J,V,Confidentiality Orders,"Any proposed order regarding the confidential exchange of information shall be based on the model Stipulation and Order for the Production and Exchange of Confidential Information. If the parties propose to deviate from the Model Order, they shall file: (1) a copy of the parties' proposed confidentiality order; (2) a redline showing proposed deviations; and (3) a letter explaining the reasons for deviations.",,"[""discovery-scheduling""]","[""Commercial Division Rule 11-g""]",1,New York,supreme,part_rules
MASLEY48-PCO-1,181,NY-COMDIV-MASLEY,¶1,Interrogatories,Interrogatories shall be served by the date set in the order. Answers to interrogatories shall be served by the date set in the order. Interrogatories are limited both in terms of topics covered and number permitted (25 including subparts). No additional interrogatories regarding claims and contentions of the parties shall be permitted.,,"[""discovery-scheduling""]","[""CD Rule 11-a""]",1,New York,supreme,preliminary_conference_order
NY-SC-1JD-CATANZARO-P37-011,70,NY-SC-1JD-CATANZARO,VI,Judicial Subpoenas - Affirmation of Necessity Required,Parties seeking a judicial subpoena must include the documents for review and an attorney affirmation giving the reasons why a judicial subpoena is necessary. The documents must be emailed as attachments to sfc-part37-clerk@nycourts.gov with only the parties to the action copied.,,"[""discovery-scheduling""]",[],1,New York,supreme,part_rules
NY-SC-9JD-GROSSMAN-004,172,NY-SC-9JD-GROSSMAN,III.E,Expert Disclosure,"Except as otherwise directed by the Court, a party who has the burden of proof on a claim, cause of action, damage or defense shall serve its response to an expert demand pursuant to CPLR § 3101(d) on or before the filing of the Note of Issue. Any opposing party shall serve its answering response pursuant to CPLR § 3101(d) within 60 days after the filing of the Note of Issue. The statutory stay for disclosure [CPLR § 3214(b)] upon the service of a dispositive motion under CPLR § 3211 shall not apply to the service of these expert responses. Any motion by a party to preclude expert testimony must be made as soon as practicable but no later than 30 days after the party's receipt of the expert disclosure.",,"[""discovery-scheduling""]","[""CPLR \u00a7 3101(d)"", ""CPLR \u00a7 3214(b)""]",9,Putnam,supreme,part_rules
NY-SC-9JD-ONDROVIC-007,161,NY-SC-9JD-ONDROVIC,EXPERT-3,Expert Testimony - AI Disclosure Requirement,"Every party must disclose whether their expert relied upon AI (Artificial Intelligence) in reaching their opinion. A Frye Hearing is mandatory for all cases in which an expert has relied upon AI. This disclosure must be included in all CPLR 3101(d) discovery responses and in those cases in which an expert affidavit/affirmation is used in a motion, the affidavit/affirmation must state whether the expert has used AI in reaching their opinion.",,"[""discovery-scheduling""]","[""CPLR \u00a7 3101(d)""]",9,Westchester,supreme,part_rules
SCHECTER54-CONFID-3,179,NY-COMDIV-SCHECTER,¶3,Definition of Confidential Information,"'Confidential Information' means all Documents and Testimony containing trade secrets, proprietary business information, competitively sensitive information, or other information the disclosure of which would, in the good faith judgment of the party designating the material, be detrimental to the conduct of that party's business or the business of any of its customers or clients.",,"[""discovery-scheduling""]",[],1,New York,supreme,confidentiality_stipulation
TORRENT-012,128,NY-SC-9JD-TORRENT,III.F,No Stay of Discovery,"There shall be no stay of pretrial discovery resulting from the filing of a motion made pursuant to CPLR 3211 or 3212, unless otherwise ordered by the Court.",,"[""discovery-scheduling""]","[""CPLR 3211"", ""CPLR 3212""]",9,Westchester,supreme,part_rules
ZUCKERMAN-007,138,NY-SC-9JD-ZUCKERMAN,III.H,Motion Effect on Discovery,"The statutory stay of discovery during CPLR §§3211, 3212, and/or 3213 motion practice (CPLR §3214) does not apply in this Part absent an Order by the Court to the contrary.",,"[""discovery-scheduling""]","[""CPLR \u00a73211"", ""CPLR \u00a73212"", ""CPLR \u00a73213"", ""CPLR \u00a73214""]",9,Westchester,supreme,part_rules