Provisions

Individual rule provisions extracted from part rules documents

Data license: Government edicts — not subject to copyright · Data source: nycourts.gov

4 rows where judicial_district = 9 and topics = "["discovery-scheduling"]"

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: topics (array), cross_references (array)

county 2

topics 1

  • ["discovery-scheduling"] · 4 ✖

judicial_district 1

doc_type 1

provision_id ▼ doc_id judge_id rule_number title text source_page topics cross_references judicial_district county court_type doc_type
NY-SC-9JD-GROSSMAN-004 Individual Part Rules of Hon. Victor G. Grossman 172 NY-SC-9JD-GROSSMAN III.E Expert Disclosure Except as otherwise directed by the Court, a party who has the burden of proof on a claim, cause of action, damage or defense shall serve its response to an expert demand pursuant to CPLR § 3101(d) on or before the filing of the Note of Issue. Any opposing party shall serve its answering response pursuant to CPLR § 3101(d) within 60 days after the filing of the Note of Issue. The statutory stay for disclosure [CPLR § 3214(b)] upon the service of a dispositive motion under CPLR § 3211 shall not apply to the service of these expert responses. Any motion by a party to preclude expert testimony must be made as soon as practicable but no later than 30 days after the party's receipt of the expert disclosure.   ["discovery-scheduling"] ["CPLR \u00a7 3101(d)", "CPLR \u00a7 3214(b)"] 9 Putnam supreme part_rules
NY-SC-9JD-ONDROVIC-007 Part Rules of Hon. Robert S. Ondrovic, J.S.C. 161 NY-SC-9JD-ONDROVIC EXPERT-3 Expert Testimony - AI Disclosure Requirement Every party must disclose whether their expert relied upon AI (Artificial Intelligence) in reaching their opinion. A Frye Hearing is mandatory for all cases in which an expert has relied upon AI. This disclosure must be included in all CPLR 3101(d) discovery responses and in those cases in which an expert affidavit/affirmation is used in a motion, the affidavit/affirmation must state whether the expert has used AI in reaching their opinion.   ["discovery-scheduling"] ["CPLR \u00a7 3101(d)"] 9 Westchester supreme part_rules
TORRENT-012 Individual Part Rules – Hon. Damaris E. Torrent, IAS Part 28 128 NY-SC-9JD-TORRENT III.F No Stay of Discovery There shall be no stay of pretrial discovery resulting from the filing of a motion made pursuant to CPLR 3211 or 3212, unless otherwise ordered by the Court.   ["discovery-scheduling"] ["CPLR 3211", "CPLR 3212"] 9 Westchester supreme part_rules
ZUCKERMAN-007 Part Rules – Hon. David S. Zuckerman, J.S.C., Westchester County Supreme Court 138 NY-SC-9JD-ZUCKERMAN III.H Motion Effect on Discovery The statutory stay of discovery during CPLR §§3211, 3212, and/or 3213 motion practice (CPLR §3214) does not apply in this Part absent an Order by the Court to the contrary.   ["discovery-scheduling"] ["CPLR \u00a73211", "CPLR \u00a73212", "CPLR \u00a73213", "CPLR \u00a73214"] 9 Westchester supreme part_rules

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE provisions (
    provision_id TEXT PRIMARY KEY,
    doc_id INTEGER REFERENCES documents(doc_id),
    judge_id TEXT REFERENCES judges(judge_id),
    rule_number TEXT,
    title TEXT,
    text TEXT,
    source_page INTEGER,
    topics TEXT,
    cross_references TEXT,
    judicial_district INTEGER,
    county TEXT,
    court_type TEXT DEFAULT 'supreme',
    doc_type TEXT DEFAULT 'part_rules'
);